Dr. Michael Osterholm’s Testimony regarding the S.F. 708 Committee Hearing

Published on March 9, 2021
Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the State Government Finance and Policy and Elections Committee,

Our world changed one year ago this week, when a national emergency was declared in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, our nation’s response to the pandemic has too often been polarized and based on politics rather than facts, data and science. We desperately needed an effective, functioning government, but more often than not over the past year, we saw partisan bickering, dysfunction, and misinformation spreading like a virus

Unfortunately, I believe our current electoral system is structured in a way that doesn’t allow us to bring out the best in one another and to govern effectively. We politicize so many things, and the coronavirus has become Exhibit A. We must address the polarization and dysfunction plaguing our democracy so that we can effectively respond to the pandemic and our next
health crisis.

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is the best step we can take to redress the dysfunction in our current system and create a more representative government with leaders who want to focus on fixing problems rather than scoring partisan points.

RCV allows voters to rank their preferences, and the rankings are used to conduct a virtual runoff to ensure elected officials earn broad majority support. It is a simple but powerful change to the ballot that encourages candidates to reach beyond their base and build broad coalitions of support, incentivizes positive campaigns based on the issues and elects leaders who are motivated to solve problems and get things done.

Leaders have a tremendous impact on policy and how we respond to a public health crisis. To respond effectively, we need leaders that focus on the issues, speak the truth and unify the public for a common purpose, and we are far more likely to elect those leaders using RCV.

SF 708 seeks to take away the power of local jurisdictions to adopt RCV at the very time we need it most. I speak on behalf of myself personally, and not on behalf of the University of Minnesota. I strongly believe we should be encouraging this reform, not banning it. Please turn back this effort to prohibit Minnesota jurisdictions from adopting RCV, especially when it holds so much power to improve our democracy and the functioning of our
government. I ask you to vote NO and reject SF 708.

Dr. Mike Osterholm

550 Vandalia St. #210

St. Paul, MN 55114

(763) 807-2550


Originally published in the
Published on

More Posts You Might Like:


Leading the way on ranked choice voting

As part of an effort to end divisive and negative election campaigns and polarized governance, U.S. election officials and policymakers are turning to ranked choice voting (RCV), otherwise known as instant runoff voting, to make our elections more civil, fair, and...

read more